Playing With Networking (Weekly Recap - January 24, 2026)

Consistency Compounds: Building Meaning Through Daily Practice and Deep Connections

Let's connect some dots from this week's notes...

This week pulled together a surprisingly coherent arc about what it means to stay committed to something real over time. From the mechanics of how repeated attention sharpens intuition, to the specific people who embody that philosophy across music, community, and intellectual work - the through-line is clear: consistency isn't boring. It's the foundation for everything that actually matters.

Remember: If you prefer to receive these recaps weekly instead of daily posts, you can manage your subscription preferences right by viewing this email on the web. Look for your profile icon in the top right of the browser, and you can update your settings from daily to weekly (and vice versa) there. However I can get you the full narrative arc without it feeling cluttered - I'm just happy you're here!

You've been collecting songs for years too, right? The real gift isn't the individual tracks - it's stepping back and realizing what your playlists of playlists reveal about how you think and feel across a decade. This post is about the archaeology of taste, the time machine effect of organized memory, and why the medium matters as much as the message.

Quote from the Personal Archive - the tech evolving around what stays constant

"I like to catalogue what I like in a list for future reference... It's, like, 39 hours long. I'm currently playing it on shuffle and it's a time machine. A daydream machine. Can't help but reflect when it's on."

The more reps you get in, the bigger your reference set becomes. The bigger your reference set, the more nuanced your intuition gets. This is how ADHD energy transforms from scatterbrained chaos into structured pattern-recognition - not by fighting the wiring, but by building the habit of writing down the constellations between starred ideas. That's intelligence. That's an act of love.

Quote from the Personal Archive - intelligence as practice, not accident

"The habit of repeating that structure isn't just intentionality, but an act of love - and, I'll say it a million times, 'you know what love is.'"

This isn't a post so much as a map. It's the connective tissue showing how individual archive entries build into pyramids over time, how record-reflect-perform becomes the operational framework that powers everything else, and why the practice itself matters more than the system you build around it. You're the variable. The tools are secondary. What counts is that you're reflecting yourself into the work.

Quote from the Personal Archive - the practice as permission

"A Personal Archive doesn't require fancy tools, a perfect system, or an audience. It requires noticing one thing today that makes you curious, jotting down why, and reflecting on it later."

Twenty years in Tigers Jaw. Brianna didn't join as a "full member" - she showed up because she loved going to shows and could play keys. Permission came from participating, not from proving yourself first. By staying committed to the community that shaped her, she became the keeper of the visual identity, the songwriter, the person whose presence ripples forward to inspire the next generation without her even knowing it. Legacy in action. And, stay for the full circle moment of Bri watching a kid who grew up watching her form his own band.

Quote from the Personal Archive - belonging through showing up

"I wasn't always a songwriter in the band. When I joined, I just played keys until our album Spin... I do all the art for the band... I do it myself, or curate them."

Bratmobile was born from constraints. Long distance meant limited rehearsal time, which meant throwing something together fast and running with it. That urgency became their sound. Thirty years later, Allison still shows up at shows, still makes herself accessible, which means parents bring their kids, which means she gets to experience the full circle moment of seeing her influences while being someone else's. Legacy isn't fame, per se, but it is staying in the game long enough to see what you started ripple forward into the next generation.

Quote from the Personal Archive - constraints as creative fuel

"We're always long distance... we've gotta throw something together real quick and then just run with it. That part of it is very DIY because we just didn't have time to polish or perfect anything."

Spite gets you started. A math teacher told Ritavan he wasn't cut out for mathematics - that rejection ignited a multi-year chase that landed him at one of France's most elite institutes on a full scholarship. But spite couldn't carry him through the actual work. The real fuel came later, when he discovered the joy of rigorous thinking and mentors who believed in him when he didn't believe in himself. Three generations of his family have carried forward one radical principle: drop your last name, refuse to be sorted into categories, treat every individual as exactly that - an individual. Legacy, there’s the word again, isn't what you inherit. It is the ideals and behaviors and framings that you choose to keep passing down.

Quote from the Personal Archive - spite as spark, not sustenance

"Spite definitely gets you started... But spite is not a very deep or uplifting emotion... You have to tap into something much deeper."

Where Else I Showed Up This Week

Lots of Excess Returns over the past week to share with you!

Damodaran walks through how he builds his portfolio with discipline - valuation frameworks, probability distributions, sell discipline. The core insight: price matters more than story or quality. He's practiced this for decades. His intuition is sharpened by reps. That's consistency as intelligence applied to markets.

Rupert's breaking down a shifting global macro landscape - emerging markets, commodities, the fatigue in US equity leadership after a decade-plus run. What strikes me is how he's testing his frameworks against reality, staying open to what the data is actually telling him rather than what he expected it to say. That's what consistency builds: the ability to change your mind when evidence demands it.

Gary learned from Peter Lynch, then spent decades building his own investing process. The lesson he emphasizes: "just cheap" doesn't work. You need conviction, process, and the discipline to stay rational when the market disagrees. He's practicing the same principle Ritavan discovered - spite (or fear, or contrarianism) gets you interested. Something deeper has to keep you going.

Chris and Robert sit down to explore how language shapes decision making. Why high valuation multiples aren't automatically overvaluation. Why "30 times earnings is expensive" is a label that destroys thinking rather than sharpens it. The deeper insight: investors who compound capital over decades think differently about time horizon, about what "map versus territory" really means. They've practiced long-term thinking so consistently it becomes intuition.

Personal Archive Prompts

What habits are you repeating that you haven't yet named as intelligence?

WHO ARE THE PEOPLE YOU STAYED COMMITTED TO, AND WHAT DID THAT COMMITMENT BUILD?

Where is spite or fear getting you started - and what deeper motivation are you discovering underneath it?

WHAT LABELS OR LANGUAGE ARE YOU USING THAT MIGHT BE DESTROYING YOUR THINKING RATHER THAN SHARPENING IT?

How far back can you trace the idealism you're carrying forward? Whose principles are you still passing down?

WHAT WOULD IT LOOK LIKE TO PRACTICE THIS LONG ENOUGH TO CALL IT INTELLIGENCE?

If someone is watching you right now without you knowing it, what are they learning?

As always, I did my part, now it's your turn to write some reflections in your own Personal Archive.

(then, be sure to let me know where you're keeping it, I'm in search of the others too)

ps. Claude helped me organize and synthesize these thoughts from the week's posts. If you are curious how I use AI, read this post: Did AI Do That: Personal Rules